November 2009
Monitoring and Risk Management
Consensus Statements
Participants convened to discuss the sanctions, monitoring, accountability and risk management for offenders who misuse alcohol
Indiana Alcohol and Crime Briefs
April 2010
The Indiana Court of Appeals became the second appellate court to consider the admissibility of SCRAM testimony and evidence. In Mogg v. State, the court upheld a trial judge’s ruling that SCRAM results were admissible under Rule 702 for the purposes of showing that the wearer consumed alcohol. See 918 N.E.2d 750 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
